Contract Act S. 176 – pawnee’s right where pawnor makes default.
Construing Section 176, it was held that the very wording of the section makes it clear that it is the discretion ...
Banking – Since the deed of guarantee was drafted by the bank, in case of doubt, had to be read against the bank
Banking - Since the deed of guarantee was drafted by the bank, in case of doubt, had to be read ...
Guarantor – If the intent been to make the directors personally liable for the outstanding liabilities of the company also, it could have been so provided in the letter of guarantee
Guarantor - Letters of guarantee signed by the directors of the company did not make any mention of any old ...
Guarantee – Interpretation of – That depends upon the terms under which the guarantor bound himself. Under the law he cannot be made liable for more than he has undertaken
Guarantee - Interpretation of - While answering the question whether the guarantee subject matter thereof was enforceable, held, “That depends ...
CrPC S. 167(2) and the Fundamental Right to Life and Personal Liberty
17. Before we proceed to expand upon the parameters of the right to default bail under Section 167(2) as interpreted by ...
In all cases where the minimum sentence is less than 10 years but the maximum sentence is not death or life imprisonment then CrPC S. 167(2) (a)(ii) will apply and the accused will be entitled to grant of ‘default bail’ after 60 days in case charge-sheet is not filed.
The right to get this bail is an indefeasible right and this right must be exercised by the accused by ...
CrPC S. 167(2) – period for filing of charge sheet would begin to run and be counted from the next date of arrest of the accused. However, the date of accused being sent on remand would be excluded but the date on which charge-sheet was filed is to be included.
Period for filing of charge sheet would begin to run and be counted from the next date of arrest of ...
Chaganti Satyanarayana v. State of A.P. – 1986 SCeJ 001
1986 SCeJ 001Download 1986 SCeJ 001 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before : Justice S. Natarajan, Justice A. N. Sen. ...
CrPC S. 167(2) – do not think it is necessary to invoke the provisions of the General Clauses Act or seek guidance from the Limitation Act to construe the terms of the proviso
“32. As the terms of proviso (a) with reference to the total periods of detention can be interpreted on the ...
State of Karnataka v. Hemareddy – 1981 SCeJ 001
1981 SCeJ 001 1981 SCeJ 001Download SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before : Justice S. Murtaza Fazal Ali and Justice ...
SRI RAJASHEKHARANANDA SWAMIJI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – 2021 PLRonline 1230
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU Before : Mrs. Justice K.S.Mudagal SRI RAJASHEKHARANANDA SWAMIJI – Petitioner, Versus THE STATE OF ...
SRI RAJASHEKHARANANDA SWAMIJI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – 2021 PLRonline 1230 –
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU Before : Mrs. Justice K.S.Mudagal SRI RAJASHEKHARANANDA SWAMIJI – Petitioner, Versus THE STATE OF ...
Neha Sood v. State of Punjab – 2017 PLRonline 0005
2017 PLRonline 0005 2017 PLRonline 0005Download PUNJAB and HARYANA HIGH COURT Before : Justice Tejinder Singh Dhindsa NEHA SOOD ...
Service matter – Transfer
Service matter - Transfer is an incident of service and violation of Transfer Policy/Instructions does not confer any right as ...