Judicial restraint – It is time to reiterate that public officers should not be called to court unnecessarily
Judicial restraint - It is time to reiterate that public officers should not be called to court unnecessarily - The ...
Judicial restraint – Practice of summoning officers , deprecated
Judicial restraint - A practice has developed in certain High Courts to call officers at the drop of a hat ...
Service matter – Once an order is issued and it is sent out to the concerned government servant, it must be held to have been communicated to him, no matter when he actually received it
Question arose that whether the order of suspension was to be actually received by the employee to be affected. This ...
Hindu Joint family – Reunion – To constitute a reunion there must be an intention of the parties to reunite in estate and interest
Hindu Joint family - Reunion - To constitute a reunion there must be an intention of the parties to reunite ...
Hindu Joint family – It is not necessary that there should be a formal and express agreement to reunite. Such an agreement can be established by clear evidence of conduct incapable of explanation on any other footing
Venkataramayya v. Tatayya , 1943 SCeJ 001 (Mad.) is a decision of a Division Bench of the Madras High Court. ...
After a partition the presumption would be against a reunion
Mayne’s Hindu law, 11th Edn., thus at p. 569: “As the presumption is in favour of union until a partition ...
General principle is that every Hindu family is presumed to be joint unless the contrary is proved; but this presumption can be rebutted by direct evidence or by course of conduct.
Court examined the principles of Hindu Law and principles of Hindu Joint Family. In paragraph 16, it was held that ...
Reunion is the reversal of the process of partition
Reunion is the reversal of the process of partition, following was held in paragraphs 8 and 12:- "8. The basic ...
Hindu Joint family – To establish reunion it is necessary to show not only that the parties already divided, lived or traded together, but that they did so with the intention of thereby altering their status and of forming a joint estate with all its usual incidents.
There was partition in the family in the year 1903 as a result of which the father with his second ...
Hindu Joint family- Reunion – When it happens it must be strictly proved as any other disputed fact is proved.
If a joint Hindu family separates, the family or any members of it may agree to reunite as a joint ...
Hindu Joint Family even if partitioned can revert back and reunite to continue the status of joint family.
Hindu Joint Family even if partitioned can revert back and reunite to continue the status of joint family. Mulla on ...
Words – “and” is used as conjunction – The use of word “or” is clearly distinctive
Interpretation - Words - “and”, “or” - The word “and” is used as conjunction - The use of word “or” ...
IPC S. 364A – Not Guilty
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 364A - Condition No.2, second part - i.e., “or by his conduct gives rise to ...
IPC, 364A – Essential ingredients
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 364A - Essential ingredients to convict an accused under Section 364A which are required to ...
IPC S. 364A – Condition, i.e., “and threatens to cause death or hurt to such person” also needs to be proved
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 364A - Section 364A uses the word “or” nine times and the whole section contains ...
