Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 S. 118 – Pronote – As per the Section 118 there is a presumption of consideration in the negotiable instrument [Section 118(a)] – Such presumption may be rebutted – However, no rebuttal evidence is led by the defendant – High Court has erred in allowing the second appeal and quashing and setting aside the decree passed by the learned Trial Court confirmed by the learned First Appellate Court.
- Log In
- Home
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- R
- S
- S
- Sale of Goods Act
- Sarfaesi
- Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992
- Service Matters
- Service of orders on a government servant
- Sexual Offence
- Special Marriage Act, 1954
- Specific Performance
- Specific Relief Act, 1963
- Stamp Act, 1899
- Stamp duty
- Stay
- Suit for declaration / possession
- Succession Act
- Suit for recovery of Money
- T
- V
- W
- Log In
- Home
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- R
- S
- S
- Sale of Goods Act
- Sarfaesi
- Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992
- Service Matters
- Service of orders on a government servant
- Sexual Offence
- Special Marriage Act, 1954
- Specific Performance
- Specific Relief Act, 1963
- Stamp Act, 1899
- Stamp duty
- Stay
- Suit for declaration / possession
- Succession Act
- Suit for recovery of Money
- T
- V
- W
CPC S. 100 - Concurrent findings of facts recorded by both the Courts below - Unless the concurrent findings recorded by the courts below were found to be perverse, the same were not required to be interfered with by the High Court in exercise of powers under Section 100 of CPC.
MVA S. 168 - Deceased – Housewife – Aged 25 year – Accident 2012 – Income taken at Rs. 7500/- (increased from Rs. 6000/- taken by High Court) – Future prospects 40% - Loss of foetus Rs. 1,00,000/- [SC]
NIA S. 118- Pronote – As per Section 118 there is a presumption of consideration in the negotiable instrument [SC]
0
