East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section Section 18- A(2) – Non compliance of – Leave to contest sought on the ground summons were not sent him as per the prescribed provisions of Section 18-A(2) – Petitioner has not been non-suited on the ground that his application for leave to defend was filed beyond the prescribed period – In fact, his application for leave to defend has been declined on merits of the grounds raised in the said application – No prejudice is shown to have been caused to the petitioner for non-compliance of the provisions of Section 18- A(2) of the Act.
- Log In
- Home
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- R
- S
- S
- Sale of Goods Act
- Sarfaesi
- Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992
- Service Matters
- Service of orders on a government servant
- Sexual Offence
- Special Marriage Act, 1954
- Specific Performance
- Specific Relief Act, 1963
- Stamp Act, 1899
- Stamp duty
- Stay
- Suit for declaration / possession
- Succession Act
- Suit for recovery of Money
- T
- V
- W
- Log In
- Home
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- R
- S
- S
- Sale of Goods Act
- Sarfaesi
- Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992
- Service Matters
- Service of orders on a government servant
- Sexual Offence
- Special Marriage Act, 1954
- Specific Performance
- Specific Relief Act, 1963
- Stamp Act, 1899
- Stamp duty
- Stay
- Suit for declaration / possession
- Succession Act
- Suit for recovery of Money
- T
- V
- W
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 18-A(2) – Non compliance of – No prejudice is shown.
by
PLRonline
in
Various Acts
0
