Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (V of 1908) Order 7, Rule 11 – Rejection of Plaint – From bare perusal of the plaint, it cannot be said that the suit is barred by the law of limitation because cause of action did not arise on the date the cheque was issued – Petitioner is correct in contending that while examining an application under Order 7 Rule 11 cpc only the contents of the plaint have to be seen – So examined, the plaint does not reveal that cause of action arose in the year 2014 and thus, the trial Court was justified in rejecting the application on the ground that limitation is a mixed question of law and fact – The defendant-petitioner can lead evidence and get the suit dismissed on the ground of limitation.
- Log In
- Home
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- R
- S
- S
- Sale of Goods Act
- Sarfaesi
- Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992
- Service Matters
- Service of orders on a government servant
- Sexual Offence
- Special Marriage Act, 1954
- Specific Performance
- Specific Relief Act, 1963
- Stamp Act, 1899
- Stamp duty
- Stay
- Suit for declaration / possession
- Succession Act
- Suit for recovery of Money
- T
- V
- W
- Log In
- Home
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- R
- S
- S
- Sale of Goods Act
- Sarfaesi
- Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992
- Service Matters
- Service of orders on a government servant
- Sexual Offence
- Special Marriage Act, 1954
- Specific Performance
- Specific Relief Act, 1963
- Stamp Act, 1899
- Stamp duty
- Stay
- Suit for declaration / possession
- Succession Act
- Suit for recovery of Money
- T
- V
- W
CPC O. 7 R. 11 – While examining an application under O. 7 R. 11 only contents of the plaint have to be seen.
in
CPC, Various Acts
0
