CIVIL
Limitation ActS. 5 – Sufficient cause – Substantial justice – Every day’s delay must be explained
1. Ordinarily a litigant does not stand to benefit by lodging an appeal late. 2. Refusing to condone delay can...
Read moreLand Acquisition Act, 1894 – Section 11, Section 18, Section 4, Section 6
2012 PLRonline 9001 (SC) SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Jagdish Singh Khehar J; B.S. Chauhan J Chhanga Singh v. Union Of...
Read moreLand Acquisition Act of 1894 – Claimant is entitled to payment of interest on solatium from the date of entitlement as provided under the provisions of the Act and payment of interest cannot be restricted from the date of Sunder case decided. Obiter in Gurpreet Singh’s case, which incidentally made some observation with regard to the payment of interest on solatium, is not the binding precedent. [2015 PLRonline 0205 (SC)]
2015 PLRonline 0205 (SC), Periyar And Pareekanni Rubbers Ltd. v. State Of Kerala SUPREME COURT OF INDIA V. Gopala Gowda...
Read more
CPC O. 21 R. 97, 99 and 101 – Impleadment in execution proceedings – All questions relating to right, title or interest and relevant shall have to be determined by the Court dealing with the application. [2022 PLRonline 1429504, 2022 SCeJ 1418]
2022 PLRonline 1429504, 2022 SCeJ 1418 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA M.R. Shah J. B.V. Nagarathna J. Bangalore Development Authority v....
Read moreCPC O. 21 R. 102 clarifies that Rule 98 and Rule 100 do not apply in cases where resistance or obstruction in the execution of a decree is offered by a transferee pendente-lite. [2022 SCeJ 1409, 2022 PLRonline 1410504]
2022 SCeJ 1409, 2022 PLRonline 1410504 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Indira Banerjee J. J.K. Maheshwari J. SRIRAM HOUSING FINANCE AND...
Read moreRegistration Act, 1908 – Section 17 – Family agreement – Compulsorily registerable – If the generation of the rights were for a valuable consideration. [Kar.]
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT H.B.Prabhakara Sastry J. SRI.M. SURENDRA RAO v. SRI. M. RAVEENDRA RAO AND OTHERS — Respondent Writ Petition...
Read more
Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 – S.118, S.121 – Merely because instrument of partition was not drawn u/s 121 , could not be said that the partition was not completed. [ 2023 SCeJ 0211]
LogIn to read 2023 SCeJ 0211 Supreme Court of India Ajay Rastogi J. Bela M. Trivedi J. JHABBAR SINGH (DECEASED)...
Read moreEducation – Brochure or Advertisement – Terms of the brochure are binding upon a candidate – It is the rule mentioned in the prospectus which will prevail over misleading notice / information available on the website of the Faculty – Constitution Of India, 1950 Article 226. [2023 PLRonline 0008 (Del.)]
2023 PLRonline 0008 (Del.) Delhi High Court Vikas Mahajan J. Rahul Kumar v. University Of Delhi Civil Writ Petition No....
Read moreCPC O. 39 R. 1, 2, CPC O. 43 R. 1 – All observations made by any Court while deciding any interlocutory application are all tentative – While deciding the main suit, Courts are not expected to get influenced by any observations that were made in the interlocutory applications.[2023 PLRonline 0006 (Andh.)]
Vepuri Mallikarjuna Rao v. Gaddapati Sitaramanjaneyulu, 2023 PLRonline 0006 Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amaravati Vepuri Mallikarjuna Rao v. Gaddapati...
Read moreSuit for injunction simpliciter – Respondent is in possession – Proper remedy for appellant was to file suit for possession with injunction – Suit simpliciter for injunction, is not maintainable – Specific Relief Act S. 41 , Evidence Act S. 58. [2009 PLRonline 0015 (Del.)]
LogIn required to read Judgment 2009 PLRonline 0015 (Del.) DELHI HIGH COURT V.B.Gupta J. Davender Lal Mehta v. Sh. Dharmender...
Read moreDoctrine of merger – Does not make a distinction between an order of reversal, modification or an order of confirmation passed by the appellate authority. [SCeJ 212701]
LogIn required for accessing Judgment There can only be one operative decree governing the same subject-matter at a given point...
Read moreCo-operative Society – Expulsion of member on account of non payment of dues – Upheld – Delhi Cooperative Society Rules, 1973, Rule 36(2). [2023 SCeJ 0158, (2023-1)209 PLR 719 (SC)]
2023 SCeJ 0158 = (2023-1)209 PLR 719 (SC) Geeta and Others v. Financial Commissioner Govt. of NCT Delhi SUPREME COURT...
Read moreWill – Legal requirements for the attestation and execution of a will – When and how to prove the genuineness.
Babu Singh v. Ram Sahai Alias Ram Singh, 2008 PLRonline 0109 Section 69 of the Evidence Act, 1872, Section 63(1)(c)...
Read moreSuit for specific performance – Conduct of the appellants shows their real intentions, as immediately after the stipulated date i.e 30.4.2009, they issued notice on 1.5.2009 , terminating the agreement to sell in question without giving an opportunity to him to perform his part of the contract by extending time . [2014 PLRonline 0207]
The suit for specific performance involves the termination of an agreement to sell without giving the other party an opportunity...
Read moreCPC O. 26 R. 9 – Local Commissioner – Application – For Demarcation – Could not be dismissed. [PLRonline 219101]
PLRonline 219101 Haryana Waqf Board v. Shanti Sarup, 2008 PLRonline 0108 (SC) Supreme Court Of India Tarun Chatterjee, J. J.M.Panchal,...
Read more
