CIVIL
CPC O. 2 R. 2 – Applies only to the suits instituted by the plaintiff.
CPC O. 2 R. 2, Applies only to the suits instituted by the plaintiff - Does not bar any defendant...
Read moreCourt fees – Order directing affixation of advalorem Court fee as per the amount claimed by bank in the suit – Upheld – Banking Regulation Act
Court Fees Act, 1879 (7 of 1870) Article 19 (as applicable to Punjab) – Under the provisions and scheme of...
Read moreCPC O. 9 R. 13 – Service upon an adult member of a family whether literate or illiterate, is a valid service
CPC Order 9 Rule 13 - Service upon an adult member of a family whether literate or illiterate, is a...
Read moreCPC O. 5 R. 15 – Non compliance of – Affect of
CPC, Order 5 Rule 15 - Non compliance - Court concurs with the submission that provisions of Order 5 Rule...
Read moreCPC O.1 R. 10 – Application for impleadment can be filed at any stage
Plea that application under Order I Rule 10 CPC could not have been entertained at a stage when arguments had...
Read more
Developer failed to complete construction of the demolished society – Interim prayer allowed restraining the developer from interfering in the act of getting the society developed through another builder / developer
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 9 - Developer failed to complete construction of the demolished society - Application by...
Read moreCourt-fees Act S. 7(iv) – (Haryana Amendment) – Dispute with regard to the agriculture land .
Court-fees Act, 1870 (7 of 1870), S. 7(iv) - (Haryana Amendment) - Dispute is with regard to the agriculture land...
Read more
Court Fee Act, 1870, S. 7 (iv)(c) – Ad valorem court fees –
Court Fee Act, 1870, Section 7 (iv)(c) – Ad valorem court fees - i) If the executant of a document...
Read moreLand – Situated within ‘lal lakir’ or ‘lal dora’ – Possession – Rapat roznamcha is required to be entered for the purpose of purchase and sale of the land situated within ‘lal lakir’ or ‘lal dora’ .
Land - Situated within 'lal lakir' or 'lal dora' – Possession - Rapat roznamcha is required to be entered for...
Read more
CPC O. 39 R. 1, 2 – Land situated within ‘lal lakir’ or ‘lal dora’ – Possession – rapat roznamcha is required to be entered for the purpose of purchase and sale of the land situated within ‘lal lakir’ or ‘lal dora’
CPC O. 39 R. 1, 2 – Land situated within 'lal lakir' or 'lal dora' – Possession - Plea that...
Read moreSpecific Relief Act, 1963 – Section 28 – S. 28 of the Act permits the judgment-debtor to seek rescission of a contract and also permits extension of time by the Court but merely because rescission of contract is not sought by the judgment-debtor, does not automatically result in extension of time.
Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Section 28 - S. 28 of the Act permits the judgment-debtor to seek rescission of...
Read more
Specific Relief Act, 1963, S. 28 – Neither the said deposit was made within the stipulated time nor extension of time was sought or granted and also no explanation has been furnished for the delay in the making of the deposit – In an appropriate case the Court which passed the decree could extend the time as envisaged in the Specific Relief, 1963
Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 28 - CPC, 1908, Order 20 Rule 12A - Shows that in every decree of...
Read moreJamabandi – Correction of entries – Revenue authorities are not competent to make correction of entries in jamabandi
Jamabandi – Correction of entries - Revenue authorities are not competent to make correction of entries in jamabandi as the...
Read moreCo-owner in exclusive possession is entitle to protect his possession against forcible intervention by other co-sharers except in due course of law namely seeking partition of the joint land
Suit for Injunction - A co-owner in exclusive possession is entitle to protect his possession against forcible intervention by other...
Read moreCPC O.18 R. 3 – Order 18, Rule 3 of the CPC would not give a right to the plaintiff to lead evidence in rebuttal on issues in which the onus of proof is on the plaintiff
CPC O.18 R. 3 - Order 18, Rule 3 of the CPC would not give a right to the plaintiff...
Read more