Limitation Act, 1963
Limitation – Expression ‘sufficient cause’ in Section 5 must receive a liberal construction so as to advance substantial justice and generally delays in preferring appeals are required to be condoned in the interest of justice
Limitation Act S. 5, Sufficient Cause - Limitation 'The contours of the area of discretion of the courts in the...
Read more
Limitation – Sufficient cause
Limitation Act S. 5, Sufficient Cause - Limitation A two-Judge Bench observed that the legislature has conferred power to condone...
Read more
Limitation – Principles
Limitation Act S. 5, Limitation - Principles Principles that can broadly be culled out are: i) There should be a...
Read more
Limitation – Courts have no power to extend the period of limitation on equitable grounds
Llaw of limitation may harshly effect a particular party but it has to be applied with all its rigor when...
Read more
Agreement to sell – Limitation – Parties did not stipulate the period, the time or the date for execution and registration of the sale deed
Limitation Act, 1963 (36 of 1963) Article 54 - Parties while executing the agreement to sell did not stipulate the...
Read more
Limitation Act, S. 5 – Government departments are under a special obligation to ensure that they perform their duties with diligence and commitment
Government departments are under a special obligation to ensure that they perform their duties with diligence and commitment “29. In...
Read more
CPC S. 96(2) – Merely because the defendant pursued the remedy under Order IX Rule 13 CPC, it does not prohibit the defendant from filing the appeal if his application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC is dismissed.
Right of appeal under Section 96(2) CPC is a statutory right. Civil Procedure Code 1908 (V of 1908), Order 9...
Read more
