CIVIL
Surety Verification – Identification by Aadhar
Criminal law - Surety Verification - Identification by Aadhar - Judicial notice of illegal charges and harassment by persons identifying...
Read more“Vendors Cannot Escape Contract After Accepting Additional Payment Post-Deadline”
2025 PLRonline 408867 = (2025-2)217 PLR 797 (SC) (SN) Download: 2025 PLRonline 408867 = (2025-2)217 PLR 797 (SC) (SN) ....
Read moreMOU for Joint Development Agreement Not Enforceable Under Specific Relief Act – Karnataka High Court
Karnataka HC rejects plaint for specific performance of MOU to execute JDA, holding agreement without consideration and privity of contract...
Read moreLand Acquisition Act, 1894, Sections 30, 31(2) & Punjab Tenancy Act, Section 5(2) – Occupancy tenants entitled to compensation – Payment wrongly made to landowners despite protest and without notice to tenants – Apportionment petition/reference by occupancy tenants maintainable – Jamabandi entries prove occupancy rights if unrebutted.
1989 PLRONLINE 003 PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT Before: Justice N.C. Jain, J. BISHAMBER - Appellant Versus STATE OF HARYANA...
Read moreLand Acquisition Act, 1894 – Compensation dispute among claimants – Civil Court jurisdiction not barred – Award by Collector not final among interested persons – Claimant can file separate civil suit for resolution of dispute
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 – Compensation dispute among claimants – Civil Court jurisdiction not barred – Award by Collector not...
Read moreSuit – Fraud – Burden of Proof – Execution of Documents – Reasonable Expectation of Understanding – It is hard to believe that a person with sound mind would sign or affix thumb impressions on multiple documents without reading them or understanding their natureSuit – Fraud – Burden of Proof . [PLRonline #468857]
Suit - Fraud - Burden of Proof - Plaintiff's Duty to Prove Case - Where fraud is pleaded in a...
Read morePowers of attorney must be strictly construed with general powers limited to the primary purpose for which they were granted, such as litigation or management – When executed by pardanashin or illiterate ladies, mere reading of the document is insufficient – full understanding of its import must be demonstrated – Agents holding power of attorney occupy a fiduciary position and must act in good faith, with transactions benefiting the agent’s own family requiring strong proof of bona fides.[PLRonline ID#712800]
1965-PLRonline-0001-PH-ID712800Download 1965 PLRonline 0001 PH ID#712800 PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT Before:- Justice Harbans Singh. Smt. NAND KAUR - Appellant...
Read moreLegal Services Authorities Act, 1987, Section 22D – PLA has the power to review. [PLRonline ID#218802]
Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, Section 22D - Liberal Procedure and Power of Review - Section 22D of the Legal...
Read moreCPC O. 23 R. 3A – Bar under Order XXIII Rule 3A applies only to parties who were part of the compromise, leaving non-parties free to sue if their independent rights are affected. A compromise binds only those who participated, and does not extend to strangers—particularly where a beneficiary holds a probated Will conferring title in rem. Accordingly, separate suits by non-parties challenging the compromise or asserting probate-based rights are maintainable. [2025 PLRonline 0112 = ID 401854]
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (V of 1908), Order XXIII Rule 3A - Bar against challenging compromise decree - Applicability restricted...
Read more
LIMITATION CALCULATOR
Calculate the Limitation Period
Read moreIBC Section 7, consciously uses the expression “default” – not the date of notifying the loan account of the corporate person as NPA.
IBC Section 7, - Default - NPA - Ordinarily, upon declaration of the loan account/ debt as NPA that date...
Read moreCPC O. 6 R. 17 – Merely introducing a declaratory relief through the proposed amendment does not alter the nature of the suit. [ID 487774]
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (V of 1908) Order 6 Rule 17 - Every amendment in the prayer clause does not...
Read moreAll the rules of procedure are the handmaid of justice.
Reference can be made to the observation made by Supreme Court in Kailash v. Nanhku 2005(4) SCC 480, wherein it...
Read moreCPC O. 39 R. 1 and 2 – Injunction restraining the petitioner from interfering with the respondent’s possession upheld. Petitioner’s claim of purchasing a share from a co-sharer rejected due to lack of evidence of possession by the co-sharer or the petitioner. Undivided shares can be sold but possession requires partition by metes and bounds. Injunction properly granted; petition dismissed. [ID 213901]
CPC O. 39 R. 1 and 2 - Injunction restraining the petitioner from interfering with the respondent's possession upheld. Petitioner's...
Read moreLease and Licence
Difference between a lease and licence
Read more