2018 PLRonline 1203
DWARKA DASS v. SURJIT KAUR , 2018 PLRonline 1203 PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT Rekha Mittal, J. DWARKA DASS v....
[SC] HMA S. 13(1)(i-a) – Subsequent conduct during the pendency of judicial proceedings – Continuing acts of the respondent would amount to cruelty even if the same had not arisen as a cause prior to the institution of the petition
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 S. 13(1)(i-a) – Subsequent conduct during the pendency of judicial proceedings - Continuing acts of the...
[SC] HMA S. 13(1)(i-a) – Consent – There is no necessity of consent by both the parties for exercise of powers under Article 142 of the Constitution of India to dissolve the marriage on the ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 S. 13(1)(i-a) – Constitution of India, Article 142 – Divorce – Marital discord –- At no...
2021 PLRonline 5106 (SC)
Sivasankaran v. Santhimeenal , 2021 PLRonline 5106 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hrishikesh Roy, JJ. Sivasankaran v. Santhimeenal...
HMA S. 13(1)(ia) — Divorce on the ground of cruelty — Non consummation of marriage
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Sec. 13(1)(ia) — Divorce on the ground of cruelty — Non consummation of marriage — Appellant-wife...
2011 PLRonline 0104
Mamta Goyal v. Ramgopal , 2011 PLRonline 0104 Rajasthan High Court Jaipur Bench Bhagwati, J. Mamta Goyal v. Ramgopal S.B....
Guardian and Wards Act, 1890, Section 26 – Relocation – We take serious note of the Father, without notifying or taking the permission of the Civil Judge, leaving its jurisdiction along with the minor – Prima facie this undermines the authority of the court and it may even tantamount to contempt of court
Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 (32 of 1956) - Guardian and Wards Act, 1890, Section 26 - Relocation -...
Central Excise Tariff Act S. 11(A) – Notices in the present cases having been issued more than decade back and the proceedings having not been concluded within reasonable time, the same deserves to be quashed
Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 (5 of 1986) Section 11(A) - Section 11A(11) of the Act provides that Cental...
2020 PLRonline 5109
Mentha & Allied Products Ltd through its Authorised Representative Satya Naraian v. Commissioner, Central Goods & Service Tax, Chandigarh, 2020...
Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act S. 6(a) – Preserves the right of the father to be the guardian of the property of the minor child but not the guardian of his person whilst the child is less than five years old
Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 (32 of 1956) Section 6(a) - Act postulates that the custody of an infant...
Bail – Judicial custody – During the entire period of investigations which appear to have been spread over seven months, the appellant was not arrested by the investigating officer – Court ought to have judiciously exercised discretion and granted bail to the appellant
Bail – Judicial custody - Grant of - During the entire period of investigations which appear to have been spread...
Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act S. 6 – It immediately provides that the custody of a minor who has not completed the age of 5 years shall ordinarily be with the mother – A proviso is in the nature of an exception to what has earlier been generally prescribed – The use of the word “ordinarily” cannot be overemphasised. It ordains a presumption, albeit a rebuttable one, in favour of the mother
Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 (32 of 1956) Section 6 - Is of seminal importance - It reiterates Section...
CPC O. 41 R. 27 – When specific allegations have been made by the plaintiff in respect of document being fraudulent, then the burden shifts upon defendant No.1/propounder of the document to prove the same to be genuine, because it is a settled principle of law that the person, who claims some right on the basis of document, is required to positively prove the same.
CPC O. 41 R. 27 - When specific allegations have been made by the plaintiff in respect of document being...
2014 PLRonline 0107
Subhash Chander v. M/S. Active Promoters Pvt. Ltd. , 2014 PLRonline 0107 Punjab and Haryana High Court Paramjeet Singh, J....
Joseph Johan Peter Sandy v. Veronica Thomas Rajkumar , 2013 PLRonline 90001
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA B.S. Chauhan and Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla, JJ. Joseph Johan Peter Sandy - Appellant v. Veronica...