PLRonline, Author at PLRonline.in

CrPC, S. 125 - "Whether the Magistrate is precluded from passing multiple sentences by entertaining a consolidated application for recovery...

Registration Act, 1908 (16 of 1908) S. 17(2)(vi), 17(1)(b) – Family Settlement – Sometimes, the court applies the rule of estoppel to honour such settlements and on other occasions, the Courts have been devising other possible ways to uphold such settlements.

Registration Act, 1908 (16 of 1908) Section 17(2)(vi), 17(1)(b) – Family Settlement – Parties have admitted that the respondents have...

Contract Act, 1872 (9 of 1872) S. 52 – Family Settlement

Contract Act, 1872 (9 of 1872) Section 52 – Clause 9 of settlement provided that Party No. 2 & 3...

PARAMJIT SINGH v. LAKHWINDER KAUR , (2022-2)206 PLR 022

(2022-2)206 PLR 022 PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT Before: Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal. PARAMJIT SINGH – Petitioner, Versus LAKHWINDER KAUR...

Newtech Promoters And Developers (P) Ltd. v. State Of U.P., PLRonline 451408

Supreme Court Of India (UDAY UMESH LALIT) (AJAY RASTOGI) (ANIRUDDHA BOSE) Newtech Promoters And Developers (P) Ltd. v. State Of...

Suit for Injunction – Observations made by the Court while deciding the interlocutory application is on the basis of the prima facie opinion of the Court. Such opinion is never final in nature.

Suit for Injunction – Trial Court Court as well as the First Appellate Court while deciding the injunction application, in...

VIKRAM SINGH v. DR. K.D. SHARMA, (2022-2)206 PLR 020

PLRonline 431560 (2022-2)206 PLR 020 PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT Before: Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal. VIKRAM SINGH – Petitioner, Versus...

SANJAY PURAN BAGDE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA , 2022 SCeJ 1004

2022 SCeJ 1004 Supreme Court of India SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, M.M. SUNDRESH, JJ. SANJAY PURAN BAGDE v. THE STATE OF...

Specific Relief Act, S. 6 – A suit can be filed by the title-holder for recovery of possession or it can be one for ejectment of an ex-lessee or for mandatory injunction requiring a person to remove himself or it can be a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act to recover possession

Specific Relief Act, S. 6 - A suit can be filed by the title-holder for recovery of possession or it...

POST 1 It is a team effort akin to a game of football involving several positions manned by many, such as defender, mid-fielder, striker, and a keeper. A striker may hit the target, while a keeper may stop an attack. The consequence of the match, either a win or a loss, is borne by all the players, though they may have their distinct roles. A goal scored or saved may be the final act, but the result is what matters. As against the specific individuals who had impacted more, the result is shared between the players. The same logic is the foundation of Section 34 IPC which creates shared liability on those who shared the common intention to commit the crime. [Para 23]

IPC S. 34 – Creates a deeming fiction by infusing and importing a criminal act constituting an offence committed by one, into others, in pursuance to a common intention – This would require the quality of evidence to be substantial, concrete, definite and clear – What is required is a common intention – Dominant feature of Section 34 is an element of intention and participation in action

IPC S. 34 - Section 34 creates a deeming fiction by infusing and importing a criminal act constituting an offence...

Jasdeep Singh @ Jassu v. State of Punjab , 2022 SCeJ 989

2022-SCeJ-989Download 2022 SCeJ 989 . SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Sanjay Kishan Kaul and M.M. Sundresh, JJ. Jasdeep Singh @ Jassu...

CrPC S. 311 – This power can be exercised at any stage of any inquiry, trial or other proceeding under the CrPC.

CrPC S. 311 - This power can be exercised at any stage of any inquiry, trial or other proceeding under...

IPC S. 201, 302 – In a case of direct evidence, motive would not be relevant, in a case of circumstantial evidence, motive plays an important link to complete the chain of circumstances – Circumstances on record do not make a complete chain to dispel any hypothesis of innocence of the appellant – Acquitted

Indian Penal Code, 1860 - S.201, S.302 - Prosecution had not alleged any motive on part of the appellant to...

Cr.P.C. First Schedule , Part-II – Where the offence is punishable for imprisonment for three years, the offence shall be cognizable and non-bailable.

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, S.11, S.11(6) – Understanding of counsel cannot be regarded as a binding statement of law on the existence of an arbitration agreement –