acr – There is nothing to doubt the ‘integrity' or ‘reliability' of the petitioner and for a span of about four months, he is assessed as ‘average' – Had the integrity been doubted or he would have been assessed as an unreliable officer then the things would have been different – For the remaining period, the reports are ‘good' and therefore, the said annual confidential report for the period 1.4.2003 to 31.3.2004 should be treated as ‘good' – Thus denial of the promotion to the petitioner cannot sustain – Annual Confidential Report.
- Log In
- Home
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- R
- S
- S
- Sale of Goods Act
- Sarfaesi
- Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992
- Service Matters
- Service of orders on a government servant
- Sexual Offence
- Special Marriage Act, 1954
- Specific Performance
- Specific Relief Act, 1963
- Stamp Act, 1899
- Stamp duty
- Stay
- Suit for declaration / possession
- Succession Act
- Suit for recovery of Money
- T
- V
- W
- Log In
- Home
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- R
- S
- S
- Sale of Goods Act
- Sarfaesi
- Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992
- Service Matters
- Service of orders on a government servant
- Sexual Offence
- Special Marriage Act, 1954
- Specific Performance
- Specific Relief Act, 1963
- Stamp Act, 1899
- Stamp duty
- Stay
- Suit for declaration / possession
- Succession Act
- Suit for recovery of Money
- T
- V
- W
ACR – ‘integrity’ or ‘reliability’ of the petitioner and for a span of about four months, he is assessed as ‘average’
by
PLRonline
0
