natural justice – No prejudice is caused to the person complaining of the breach of natural justice where such person does not dispute the case against him or it – This can happen by reason of estoppel, acquiescence, waiver and by way of non-challenge or non-denial or admission of facts, in cases in which the Court finds on facts that no real prejudice can therefore be said to have been caused to the person complaining of the breach of natural justice – Prejudice exception must be more than a mere apprehension or even a reasonable suspicion of a litigant – It should exist as a matter of fact, or be based upon a definite inference of likelihood of prejudice flowing from the non-observance of natural justice. #2020 SCeJ 2018
read here