CrPC, 1974 (2 of 1974), S.438 – Cancellation of bail  – The order granting anticipatory bail has ignored material aspects, including the nature and gravity of the offence, and the specific allegations against them –  Hence, a sufficient case has been made out for cancelling the anticipatory bail granted by the High Court.

CrPC, 1974 (2 of 1974), S.438 – Cancellation of bail  –   Penal Code (45 of 1860), S.302,  S.323,  S.34 – anticipatory bail – Allegations of causing death of deceased by firing – Appellant's case supported by the fir, his statements under Sections 161 and 164 of the CrPC- Statements of the other two eye-witnesses recoded under Section 164 of the CrPC –  Investigating officer's first report indicated that there was a prima facie case against the accused  –  Supplementary challan indicates that more material had emerged during the course of investigation as against the events portrayed in the FIR registered – Case portrayed by the appellant could not have been ignored by solely relying on the counter-FIR –  High Court did not address clear deficiencies in course of investigation was highlighted in order of JMFC and trial Court's order –  The offence is of a serious nature of murder –  The FIR and the statements under Sections 161 and 164 of the CrPC indicate a specific role to JS and SS in the crime – The order granting anticipatory bail has ignored material aspects, including the nature and gravity of the offence, and the specific allegations against them –  Hence, a sufficient case has been made out for cancelling the anticipatory bail granted by the High Court.

read HERE