Security interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 Rule 9(1) –Inspite rule being mandatory the act of the petitioners of first having opted to redeem the property and then having remained unsuccessful, the Courts can always deny the equitable and discretionary relief under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
- Log In
- Home
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- R
- S
- S
- Sale of Goods Act
- Sarfaesi
- Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992
- Service Matters
- Service of orders on a government servant
- Sexual Offence
- Special Marriage Act, 1954
- Specific Performance
- Specific Relief Act, 1963
- Stamp Act, 1899
- Stamp duty
- Stay
- Suit for declaration / possession
- Succession Act
- Suit for recovery of Money
- T
- V
- W
- Log In
- Home
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- R
- S
- S
- Sale of Goods Act
- Sarfaesi
- Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992
- Service Matters
- Service of orders on a government servant
- Sexual Offence
- Special Marriage Act, 1954
- Specific Performance
- Specific Relief Act, 1963
- Stamp Act, 1899
- Stamp duty
- Stay
- Suit for declaration / possession
- Succession Act
- Suit for recovery of Money
- T
- V
- W
Sarfaaesi Act S. 17(1) - Limitation to challenge the sale - 45 days - From the date of auction or confirmation of sale. 2022 PLRonline 5555 P&H
Judgment - Judgment of a Court interpreting a provision of law does not lay down a new principle of law, rather clarifies the legal position as to what it intended to mean. (2022-1)205 PLR 444 P&H
Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 Rule 9(1) – Equitable relief –
in
Banking
0
