Tenancy – Leave to defend – Petition for ejectment for bonafide personal necessity to start a coaching institute after his superannuation – At the stage of deciding the application under Section 13-A(4) of the Haryana Act, the question simpliciter is as to whether there was any triable issue on the pleas raised by the tenant and if yes, whether intervention of the tenant to have his participation for adjudication of such issues, was necessary – Even though the procedure in a way is summary but by no means, it is to be short-circuited to facilitate entry of a retiree in the premises owned by him. All the conditions stipulated in the relevant provision of Sections 13A(IA) & 13(3)(a)(i) are also required to be complied with – Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act 1973, Section 13A(4).
read HERE (2014-4)176 PLR 518, 2014 PLRonline 1985
Jitender Kumar v. R. S. Virk
