Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (V of 1908) Section 115 – When the statements of DW2 and DW3 were recorded, then defendant No.1 along with his counsel were present– No cross examination done by the defendant No. 1 – Defendants not asking for relief against each other – Rightly not allowed to cross-examine DW2 and DW3 and application so moved by defendant No.1 was correctly dismissed.
- Log In
- Home
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- R
- S
- S
- Sale of Goods Act
- Sarfaesi
- Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992
- Service Matters
- Service of orders on a government servant
- Sexual Offence
- Special Marriage Act, 1954
- Specific Performance
- Specific Relief Act, 1963
- Stamp Act, 1899
- Stamp duty
- Stay
- Suit for declaration / possession
- Succession Act
- Suit for recovery of Money
- T
- V
- W
- Log In
- Home
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- R
- S
- S
- Sale of Goods Act
- Sarfaesi
- Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992
- Service Matters
- Service of orders on a government servant
- Sexual Offence
- Special Marriage Act, 1954
- Specific Performance
- Specific Relief Act, 1963
- Stamp Act, 1899
- Stamp duty
- Stay
- Suit for declaration / possession
- Succession Act
- Suit for recovery of Money
- T
- V
- W
CPC S. 115 – No cross examination done by the defendant No. 1 – Defendants not asking for relief against each other – Rightly not allowed to cross-examine DW2 and DW3 .
in
CPC, Various Acts
0
