Sarfaesi – Auction – Rule 9(4) – Appears to be not as sacrosanct and the period can be extended
Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002, Rule 9(4) - Appears to be not as sacrosanct and the period can be extended ...
Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002, Rule 9(4) - Appears to be not as sacrosanct and the period can be extended ...
Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002, Rule 9(4) - Four days’ delay which was caused in terms of the original auction ...
Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002- R. 9(4) - The period of fifteen days in Rule 9(4) is not that sacrosanct ...
Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 R. 9(4) - Auction – Amount not deposited – Lockdown – Covid - The respondent ...
Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 R. 9(4) - Auction – Amount not deposited – Stay – Affect of – Interest ...
Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 R. 9(4) - Respondent bank has stated that the sale confirmation letter could not be ...
Full text with judgments is available only for Subscribers.
PLRonline.in Subscription also forms part of the Punjab Law Reporter annual subscription @ Rs. 2800/- (limited time offer)
PLRonline subscription @ Rs. 2200/- . Call 9463598502
Click here for activating Trial Pack
Subscribers can take a print out of the FULL JUDGMENT by clicking on the “PDF” printer sign on the top right (above the judgment)