CrPC S. 439 – Bail – Consideration – Court while deciding an application for bail, should refrain from evaluating or undertaking a detailed assessment of evidence, as the same is not a relevant consideration at the threshold stage – While a Court may examine prima facie issues, including any reasonable grounds whether the accused committed an offence or the severity of the offence itself, an extensive consideration of merits which has the potential to prejudice either the case of the prosecution or the defence, is undesirable.
- Home
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- R
- S
- S
- Sale of Goods Act
- Sarfaesi
- Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992
- Service Matters
- Service of orders on a government servant
- Sexual Offence
- Special Marriage Act, 1954
- Specific Performance
- Specific Relief Act, 1963
- Stamp Act, 1899
- Stamp duty
- Stay
- Suit for declaration / possession
- Succession Act
- Suit for recovery of Money
- T
- V
- W
CrPC S. 439 – Bail – Consideration – Court while deciding an application for bail, should refrain from evaluating or undertaking a detailed assessment of evidence, as the same is not a relevant consideration at the threshold stage
0
326
SHARES2.5k
VIEWS
Previous Post
CrPC S. 439 – High Court or the Sessions Court must grant bail after the application of a judicial mind, following well-established principles, and not in a cryptic or mechanical manner
Next PostMVA S. 163-A – Dependency has no relevance in an application filed under Section 163 A of Act, 1988.
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
LATEST
- “Vendors Cannot Escape Contract After Accepting Additional Payment Post-Deadline” November 1, 2025
- MOU for Joint Development Agreement Not Enforceable Under Specific Relief Act – Karnataka High Court October 29, 2025
- Termination of Arbitral Proceedings for Non-Filing of Statement of Claims — Not an Arbitral Award under Section 25(a) October 27, 2025
- (no title) October 22, 2025
- Supreme Court: Deception Alone Insufficient for Cheating Without Dishonest Inducement Prosecution Must Prove Accused Made Forged Document and Had Requisite Mens Rea. ID 416860 October 22, 2025
- Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Sections 30, 31(2) & Punjab Tenancy Act, Section 5(2) – Occupancy tenants entitled to compensation – Payment wrongly made to landowners despite protest and without notice to tenants – Apportionment petition/reference by occupancy tenants maintainable – Jamabandi entries prove occupancy rights if unrebutted. October 22, 2025
- Land Acquisition Act, 1894 – Compensation dispute among claimants – Civil Court jurisdiction not barred – Award by Collector not final among interested persons – Claimant can file separate civil suit for resolution of dispute October 22, 2025
